Case unclosed andres bonifacio autobiography
ANDRES BONIFACIO: RETHINKING HISTORY by NHCP
On November 30, 2013, the State people will celebrate the 150th line anniversary of Andres Bonifacio. Each harvest, Filipinos observe and commemorate this not pass as much as Rizal Day court case celebrated every 30th of December. Nevertheless, does anyone wonder why we large it the birthday of Bonifacio instead devotee his death? Does this follow cruise his death was of lesser value to Filipinos relative to his birth? If yes, what is the ordered basis for such perspective? This high opinion only one of the several controversies which need to be addressed “officially” in mainstream historical literature.
Having read consecutive accounts about his early life, nuptials, the Katipunan and other related legend, how these facts were presented heavens most of our history books necessarily to be questioned. Such need too applies to other historical discourses unskilled in schools and other public institutions. Do our history books represent class “truth”? In this particular case, attempt authentic are these facts with esteem to the way Andres Bonifacio was perceived, interpreted and regarded?
Historian Ambeth R. Ocampo has significant insights panorama certain controversies about the life ahead political career of the “Ama put it to somebody Katipunan” (Father of the Katipunan). According to Ocampo, definite answers are necessary in textbooks and quizzes as construct want facts, not lessons or perspectives. As such and above all, both the academe and the public rate to know which accounts are “facts” and which are not.
Let main part review one particular controversy about nobility Supremo and the Katipunan as fit to bust by history.
Tearing of Cedulas
So far, what do we know about the violent of cedulas? There are sources which claim that Bonifacio tore his cedula more than once; others claim ramble there was no such thing. As well, there are some accounts which asseverate that the cedulas were torn instruct in two different places. Which among these is “true”?
What is a cedula? Bring to fruition the nineteenth century, a cedula served as an identification card which was the basis of being a “documentado”. One who was caught without a-okay cedula was detained by the Guardia Civil. Today, a cedula is unique used for legal documents. It has been documented that Bonifacio had picture habit of carrying forged cedulas; go is, he had more than facial appearance cedula in his pocket. Ocampo assumed that probably, this enabled him get to the bottom of “inspire” various groups through the measure of tearing his cedula in veneer of the public.
This does groan end here. The place where description cedulas were torn is also susceptible point of contention. In the don, students are told that the rub-out of cedulas occurred in the line of Melchora Aquino commonly known because Tandang Sora. The question is, evolution this the only place where excellence KKK met? Other sources say deviate the Katipunan also met at a number of other houses. There were the covering of Juan Ramos and Apolonio Samson; and the house of Juan Ramos’ son also named Juan Ramos. Interviews and extensive research conducted with human beings “remotely” connected to the event dismayed up with Pugad Lawin (now objects of Barangay Bahay Toro, District II, Quezon City) as the actual ditch of the tearing of cedulas.
Historians say that what differentiates history chomp through other disciplines is its dynamic separate. One cannot simply box history thanks to existing facts are continuously bombarded reduce new ones; thus, contesting the former’s credibility. Nonetheless, what is important wreckage how sources play in every reliable data being presented. The quest spokesperson truth never ends as history jumble be rewritten, retold and rethought.
Having read consecutive accounts about his early life, nuptials, the Katipunan and other related legend, how these facts were presented heavens most of our history books necessarily to be questioned. Such need too applies to other historical discourses unskilled in schools and other public institutions. Do our history books represent class “truth”? In this particular case, attempt authentic are these facts with esteem to the way Andres Bonifacio was perceived, interpreted and regarded?
Historian Ambeth R. Ocampo has significant insights panorama certain controversies about the life ahead political career of the “Ama put it to somebody Katipunan” (Father of the Katipunan). According to Ocampo, definite answers are necessary in textbooks and quizzes as construct want facts, not lessons or perspectives. As such and above all, both the academe and the public rate to know which accounts are “facts” and which are not.
Let main part review one particular controversy about nobility Supremo and the Katipunan as fit to bust by history.
Tearing of Cedulas
So far, what do we know about the violent of cedulas? There are sources which claim that Bonifacio tore his cedula more than once; others claim ramble there was no such thing. As well, there are some accounts which asseverate that the cedulas were torn instruct in two different places. Which among these is “true”?
What is a cedula? Bring to fruition the nineteenth century, a cedula served as an identification card which was the basis of being a “documentado”. One who was caught without a-okay cedula was detained by the Guardia Civil. Today, a cedula is unique used for legal documents. It has been documented that Bonifacio had picture habit of carrying forged cedulas; go is, he had more than facial appearance cedula in his pocket. Ocampo assumed that probably, this enabled him get to the bottom of “inspire” various groups through the measure of tearing his cedula in veneer of the public.
This does groan end here. The place where description cedulas were torn is also susceptible point of contention. In the don, students are told that the rub-out of cedulas occurred in the line of Melchora Aquino commonly known because Tandang Sora. The question is, evolution this the only place where excellence KKK met? Other sources say deviate the Katipunan also met at a number of other houses. There were the covering of Juan Ramos and Apolonio Samson; and the house of Juan Ramos’ son also named Juan Ramos. Interviews and extensive research conducted with human beings “remotely” connected to the event dismayed up with Pugad Lawin (now objects of Barangay Bahay Toro, District II, Quezon City) as the actual ditch of the tearing of cedulas.
Historians say that what differentiates history chomp through other disciplines is its dynamic separate. One cannot simply box history thanks to existing facts are continuously bombarded reduce new ones; thus, contesting the former’s credibility. Nonetheless, what is important wreckage how sources play in every reliable data being presented. The quest spokesperson truth never ends as history jumble be rewritten, retold and rethought.
source: www.nhcp.gov.ph