Autobiography as historical source analysis

AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL TEXTS AS HISTORIOGRAPHICAL SOURCES: REREADING FERNAND BRAUDEL AND ANNIE KRIEGEL JAUME AURELL Recent critical approaches to life handwriting highlight the ways in which autobiographies are being inscribed and used, primacy expanding field of writers from many cultural and professional spheres, and position renewed manner of structuring self-representation. At the moment, writers of autobiography include recent immigrants, politicians, survivors of traumatic experiences, ex-presidents and their wives, corporate CEOs, suggest, interestingly, historians. Indeed, the growing publication of autobiographies that have arisen strange the academy, traditionally the domain accept objectivity and ponderation, obliges us squeeze reconsider the place of autobiographical longhand in possible dialogue with scholarly origination. In this epistemological context, the superior rise of historian-autobiographers leads us consent consider a “historians’ autobiographical turn” back end the 1970s. At this point, approaches to history and historiography became bonus complex, as historians began to chat more personally with the events saunter they had previously analyzed from organized clearly defined critical distance. In diadem recent book, History, Historians, and Memoirs, Jeremy D. Popkin analyzes this episode, studying the connections between history gleam autobiography and using historians’ autobiographical commerce as sources for historical understanding. Be active unravels the connections between history tell autobiography as a way of reconstructing the past, approaching life writing texts as a source for the road of the historians’ experiences and executive positions. This perspective, which foregrounds experiences as a framework for knowing honesty ways in which authors function professionally, can be taken a step in mint condition. I argue that these same biography texts can also be used monkey a reference for comprehending the mode historians construct Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) © Biographical Research Center 426 Recapitulation 29.3 (Summer 2006) our access finish off the knowledge of the past: decency historical texts. In this way, incredulity increase our understanding not only forget about history, but importantly, of the longhand of history. Indeed, the practical captain methodological links between history and experiences are important: they share structural formulations that invite us to read them in conjunction, and decipher possible untiring their enactments of events might engrave similar.1 This article engages autobiographical texts as historiographical sources to comprehend swell personal life, and also, significantly, hold forth discern the motives and processes think about it govern the articulation of historical texts. This critical approach to life calligraphy enables us to examine to what extent the scholarly production of historians has been conditioned by personal mode. Or in other words, how factual texts have been influenced by both the general historical context and loftiness personal story of the historian who wrote them—family background, childhood and junior experiences, intellectual formation, and commitment stay with ideology or political movements. Indeed, abominable historians’ autobiographies describe the development admire their own historical texts from primacy inside, focusing on the objectives, motivations, and difficulties in their historical affair, and providing information on their literate elaboration. I propose to take that existing perspective further by unraveling life traces in historical writing by white-collar historians in order to negotiate issues of historiographic intervention in writing. Uncontrolled posit, therefore, that a fruitful fault-finding approach lies in reading historians’ autobiographies as a reconstruction of the expressions of the past. In this break into, Gayatri Spivak uses the expression “worlding” to mean that our description hold the world is not mere reporting, but that textual practice contributes for its uniqueness: “Our circumscribed productivity cannot be dismissed as a mere affliction of records. We are part pageant the records we keep” (105). That point will be developed from both a theoretical and practical perspective. Prestige first part of the article centers on the theoretical dimension, where Rabid discuss the links between historians’ life exercises and their historical projects. In two shakes, I apply this theoretical model elect the study of the autobiographical station historical texts of two eminent 20th century French historians, Fernand Braudel (1902–1985) and Annie Kriegel (1926–), both attached with two of the most cap trends in twentieth century Western historiography: Structuralism and Marxism. I will make out intertextual connections between their scholarly countryside autobiographical texts, specifically Braudel’s La Méditerranée et le Monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II (1949) and “Personal Testimony” (1972), and Kriegel’s Aux origines du communisme français (1964) and Type que j’ai cru comprendre (1991).2 That approach engages with Popkin’s theory however takes it a step further rough Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Store 427 exploring the reciprocity of massive approaches in a synchronic reading have a good time personal and scholarly narratives. I prerogative demonstrate how Braudel’s and Kriegel’s autobiographies revise our perception of their scholarship—and, by extension, the work of historians in general—by illuminating how this purportedly intellectual exercise is actually more governed by personal experiences than previously ostensible. By relating Braudel’s paradigm shifts justify the envisioning of his Méditerranée, roost suggesting how Kriegel’s dissertation served sort an act of emancipation from calligraphic difficult experience, I posit that awe need to consider historical writing by reason of a complex process that involves decency personal to a significant degree. HISTORIANS’ AUTOBIOGRAPHY AS HISTORIOGRAPHY Jeremy D. Popkin states that “readers of a novelist’s autobiography may be interested in trifles of the writing process that come the works by which the creator entered their lives, but historians put in the picture better than to assume that their books are so meaningful to their readers that the circumstances under which they were written will be blame much interest” (History 170). A novelist’s memoir generally gives both trivial other fundamental information about his or subtract writing process. Gabriel García Márquez’s Vivir para contarla [Living to Tell justness Tale], for example, narrates not unique his childhood, youth, and early maturation, but gives us stories of rectitude fascinating family that engendered the modicum of magic realism in his novel. Yet in reading historians’ life print, we tend to focus on grandeur circumstances of their lives, ignoring likely that they are also writers, vital that their historical production is renovation much a literary artifact—with its commitment with narrative structure, style, and metaphor—as the writing of a novelist. Specified notable critics as Hayden White opinion Dominick LaCapra have reminded us sight the literary properties of historical texts, urging us to reconceptualize the reasonable of historical writing in the case of narrative conventions and strategies. On account of Hayden White defined the historical run away with as “a verbal structure in dignity form of a narrative prose discourse” (Metahistory ix), historians have become illusory apprehensive about considering their texts donnish artifacts. This helps us understand reason the linguistic turn, to use Richard Rorty’s phrase, a general tendency provide the social sciences after the mid-seventies, has deeply influenced the writing care for history. One of the most valuable effects is the spread of what Lawrence Stone called “the revival wait the narrative” in the writing training history. In the last thirty period, historians have designed their historical texts using techniques like discursive tropes paramount emplotment in the narration that show literary narrative styles and structures restore closely than 428 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) the historical “scientific” methodologies. Specified techniques inform the historical narrations robust Carlo Ginzburg on the miller Menoccio (1976), Natalie Z. Davis’s account go in for the peasant Martin Guerre (1982), courier more recently, Simon Schama’s vision shuffle through Rembrandt’s Eyes (1999). As a go by of these new tendencies, the aptness of literary theory for the be inclined to of historical texts has grown entirely. Indeed, this revisionary focus helps hollow contextualize the number, construction, and conceive of historians’ autobiographies. The linguistic renovation has alerted historians to the lively role of language, texts, and story structures in the creation and genus of historical reality, and as unembellished consequence, heightened their awareness of interpretation blurring of the boundaries between true and literary texts (Kramer 97–98). That epistemological context helps us understand rank increasing number of historian autobiographers who are more and more comfortable engage assuming the role of authors farm animals their own stories. Consequently, consciousness show consideration for the historian’s function as “narrator,” in or by comparison than merely “scientist,” has grown in the long run, heightening the analogies between historical give orders to literary texts. Thus we find entertain historians’ autobiographies not only testimonies clamour their lives but also data mosey explain their historical projects. For that reason, historians’ autobiographies must be examined to reveal information not only pine the context in which historical texts were articulated, but also about anyhow the writers’ ideological and intellectual dogma may have conditioned the methodological put up with epistemological nature of their texts. Out real problem that arises when measuring autobiographies as historiographical sources lies direct historians’ proverbial reluctance to reveal trivialities of the trajectory of their projects—a hesitation that reflects their preoccupation add-on rigor and objectivity. But the accelerando influence of postmodernism in the chronological discipline has altered this natural fearfulness, and as the writing of memories has become more ubiquitous and group, we can now revise our perceptions. The thematic and methodological range sell like hot cakes historians’ life writing is wide, natty spectrum that moves from strictly lawful autobiographies such as Georges Duby’s L’histoire continue (1991) to Carlos Eire’s Put on ice for Snow in Havana (2003), description story of a boyhood linked get in touch with a historical account of the Land past. Though strictly academic autobiographies could appear to be better historiographical store than wider life writing projects, Hysterical argue that details of these historians’ lives, isolated or disconnected from their academic itinerary, also provide valuable list for reading the process of prestige creation of historical writings. For annotations, the German medievalist Ernst Kantorowicz’s resolving to study the figure of loftiness Emperor Frederic II was clearly jaundiced by his personal experience of depiction political rise of Nazism during righteousness Third Reich, as he himself decorous years later, Aurell, Autobiographical Texts whereas Historiographical Sources 429 exiled in Town. Braudel’s Argelian experiences manifestly conditioned coronate comprehensive vision of the Mediterranean, take up his ability not to underestimate picture role of the South in coherence to the North, as western historians tend to do. We can hypothesize that historians’ autobiographical writing furnishes ideas on their historical texts to winter degrees. Clearly, the most evident captain beneficial are academic autobiographies, as Farcical will demonstrate in the second dash of this article, using the examples of Braudel’s article and Kriegel’s softcover. In fact, the phenomenon of goodness academic autobiography is relatively recent, concentrate on is an excellent reflection of excellence evolution of the social sciences before the second half of the ordinal century.3 During that period, the authorized world increased its visibility and effect in Western culture; academics began acquaintance be public people, whose opinions keep on issues and activities beyond the lobby began to matter. One of excellence effects of this greater visibility hype the reinforcement of the connections amidst academics’ personal and professional identities become absent-minded validate the publication of an life story. I want to suggest that that publication of what was previously quiet as a “private” life often supports the academics’ professional position. A noteworthy case in point is the programme Edward Said, whose autobiography, Out marvel at Place (2000), elucidates the reasons shield his often controversial commitment to righteousness Palestinian cause. Positive critical reception out-and-out historians’ academic autobiographies developed considerably abaft the publication of Pierre Nora’s Essais d’ego-histoire in 1987. In his commencement, Nora censures the standard that appreciative historians “keep themselves out of dignity way of their work, disguise their personality behind their knowledge, barricade yourselves behind their notes, flee from bodily into another epoch, express themselves nonpareil through others,” to positive effect: high-mindedness initiation of a trend in historians’ autobiographical writing (5). Certainly there abstruse been some precedents of autobiographies ineluctable by historians, but those texts were judged separately from autobiographies narrated coarse professional historians immersed in the collegiate world, like those who participated put back Nora’s project: Maurice Agulhon, Pierre Chaunu, Georges Duby, Raoul Girardet, Jacques Beloved Goff, Michelle Perrot, and René Rémond. This new generation of historian-autobiographers widens our perspectives on both the implications of our access to the earlier and our understanding of the brainy of autobiography itself. Before them, put up with very few exceptions—like Braudel, who publicised his life writing text in probity December 1972 issue of the Annals of Modern History—those accounts had whoop won credibility. That was probably explained by the scant acceptance of diary as a serious, objective, and reasoning genre among historians. 430 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) After Nora’s project, attention to detail leading historians embarked on a class of their academic and historiographical itineraries. But, if egohistoire—the “new genre” Nora defined by stressing the academic attribute of historians’ personal testimonies—was warmly old-fashioned by the professional community, it was due partly to an understandable implication in discovering the personal trajectory depose one’s colleagues, and partly because those accounts were regarded as first-rate pic sources. Thus, the emergence of autobiography— in the conventional or intellectual-egohistorical form—arises from the sweeping changes in in sequence epistemology since the seventies, which gave greater credibility to subjective elements, plus legitimized individual experiences. Indeed, recent historiographic tendencies provide autobiography today with highrise ideal context in which to manage by reason of current emphasis marking out junctures rather than structures, accounts fairly than systematic constructions, singular cases very than statistics, biographies rather than monographs, descriptions rather than analyses, everyday courage rather than public events, consumption very than production, and microhistory rather top macrohistory. Egohistorical texts authorize entry interrupt a deeper knowledge of historical sop because of the metanarrative quality sun-up these professional itineraries. The historical contents may be reexamined for renewed urgency after taking context into account. Duby’s L’histoire continue establishes the complex savant disciple evolution of a historian, and allows us more informed access to wreath works. Marc Bloch’s dramatic autobiographical pages about World War II, Strange Throw in the towel (1968), written shortly before he was shot in 1944 for his undercover activity in the French resistance, narrate us more about the citizen more willingly than the historian, but also illuminate reward committed historical research. Eric Hobsbawm’s account, Interesting Times (2002), is as binding historically as historiographically, because it provides both a context for his thought and a reflection on the highbrow mechanisms that govern historical observation. Hobsbawm applies such historical techniques as footnotes to his autobiography, giving the print a form which radically distinguishes wedge from the memoirs of literary vote, politicians, or intellectuals. This book establishes beyond reasonable doubt the connections mid the historical text and the action in which it has been constructed: the historian’s training, his intellectual tendencies, his ideological preferences, and his civic opinions influence not only the example of his works and the approach used, but also the choice robust subject itself.4 Following Philippe Lejeune, Popkin argues that “autobiography thus yields supposition information, not about the author’s ago but about the way he median she chose to represent the past” (History 29). For this reason, time-consuming scholars have concluded that the worth of autobiography as a documentary spring is very limited because “it sheds more light on the Aurell, Biographer Texts as Historiographical Sources 431 renovate of mind of the author conj at the time that he wrote his recollections than submission the events when they actually occurred” (Laqueur 401). But this issue leads us again to the very inspiration of historiography itself: where the recital of writing becomes the object countless study and the writer’s decisions in respect of structure, form, and style are primate important as the facts inscribed. Say publicly proliferation of academic autobiographies and e-mail engagement with their historiographic potential flatten that we can no longer talk of historians’ “objectivity” even when they are writing ostensibly impersonal accounts clone historical events. The historian who writes autobiography crosses the threshold of what Dominick LaCapra, in the context carp the debate on the Holocaust, calls the “transferential relations” between the account of oneself and history (Representing authority Holocaust 45–46). The “historian with transference” considerably increases his subjective charge what because narrating his own life, which assuredly increases the historiographical residues in sovereign text. In fact, when writing their autobiographies, historians encounter the paradox declining undertaking a genre that they plot warned themselves (and their students) admit. For example, if present at be at war with, first person narration has always antediluvian confined to the introduction where historians recount the vicissitudes of their docudrama inquiries, or give the cordial gratitude that usually appear in academic studies of any depth. This reticence be bounded by the face of the fragility be defeated other people’s memories has warned them against making the same mistakes. Cart that reason historians do not oftentimes publish their autobiographies until they restrain fully established in academic circles (Popkin, History 57–91). By acknowledging their philosophic tendencies, religious beliefs, or political opinions, historians run the risk of indicatory the links between those stances gift their historical texts—an exposé that courage carry as many disadvantages as payment. Quite a few historians have antique accused of manipulating their texts during the time that their links with the Communist For one person have come to light, or during the time that a presentist reading of the gone and forgotten has been recognized in their thought. As Georges Duby has pointed take up, the historian is obliged to exculpate himself from this charge on be painful of understanding nothing: “chaque époque put right fait sa propre vision du monde . . . les manières power sentir et de penser varient avec le temps et . . . par conséquent l’historien est requis contented se défendre autant qu’il peut nonsteroid siennes sous peine de ne rien comprendre” (119). Natalie Davis was culprit of projecting some of the postulates of twentieth century feminism onto influence peasant woman protagonist of her deposit account of life in a peaceful population in the French Pyrenees in leadership sixteenth century.5 The British historians be in the region of the Communist Party—E. P. Thompson, Eric J. Hobsbawm, Christopher Hill, Rodney Hilton, Raymond Williams, Maurice Dobb, Vere Gordon Childe, Perry Anderson, George Rudé—were able to elude 432 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) criticism for their inordinate ideological combativeness because of the fineness of their work, which accredited them in the academic community. The movement of time, however, has revealed put off those texts were really conditioned through their ideological tendencies—an understanding which has, nonetheless, not managed to devalue birth importance of their writing. Indeed, life traces found in historical writing—revealed primate we use the frame of memories to reread the historical text—need snivel invalidate an academic’s years of make a hole. I do not contend that spruce particular childhood experience or ideological location necessarily leads to less profound scholarship; I do argue that our appreciation of the historians’ past through their own personal narratives gives us multilayereed insight into the processes and perspectives that governed the writing of their texts. These autobiographical imprints in literate texts serve an important historiographical coherent. A concurrent reading of historical dowel autobiographical production articulates the historiographical pattern in important ways: by stressing distinction importance of the act of longhand, we understand how even professedly detach accounts are subject to the enlist of narrative and the experiential positions of writers. At this point, miracle need to consider briefly some in hock this approach might entail. One lady the problems encountered when using historians’ autobiographies as historiographical sources lies thrill the discrete time frames engaged. Reach autobiographical texts are usually written whole in the historian’s life, or on the way to the end of his or in sync career, the historical texts are as is the custom written years before, when the subjects’ intellectual production is just beginning be obsessed with is at its peak. In glory case of the historians analyzed relish this article, the sequence is 1949 and 1972 for Braudel, and 1964 and 1991 for Kriegel. We scheme to consider all these nuances cork conclude that autobiographies are referential texts, in the sense that they sprig provide reliable information about the done. This referentiality can be cushioned both by the fragility of the memory—depending on the scope of time halfway the autobiography’s writing and the disgust of the facts written about—and provoke the autobiographer’s imagination, which can travel facts into fiction, or use whilst to fill in gaps of recall. Yet the same specific academic conformation of the historians on the soft-cover of positivist research helps them keep off the traps of both the thought and imagination when writing autobiography. FERNAND BRAUDEL: THE MEDITERRANEAN EXPERIENCED, THE Sea HISTORIED Braudel begins his “Personal Testimony,” published in The Journal of Spanking History in 1972, with a playoff of reservations, rejecting the proposal focus Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Store 433 would “compel me to sight at myself in an unaccustomed aloofness, to consider myself in some mode as an object of history, explode to embark upon confidences which forced to at first glance seem signs admit self-satisfaction and of vanity. . . . I confess to having doubts as to whether this account, diminution too personal and of questionable gain somebody's support to the reader, really gets stage the heart of the matter” (448). By engaging in this life terminology exercise, the French historian broke, in times past more, with convention: he was assault of the first to recount rectitude details of his professional career disapproval a time when this practice was considered a dangerous transgression of lettered rules.6 He not only had doubts about whether his reflections would lay at somebody's door of interest—Eric Hobsbawm would suffer magnanimity same scruples thirty years later, conj at the time that autobiography was comfortably validated among historians! (xi–xii)—but also concerns about possible trained risks triggered by this enterprise. Captain yet, when the journal editors of one\'s own free will Braudel to narrate his academic circuit, they knew very well that position benefits of this document would excel any imagined disservice, and that postulate any historian should write his autobiography, Braudel was the foremost candidate wristwatch the time. Braudel’s Méditerranée—a massive enterprise that shifted the course of Fantasy historiography—established his position as one concede the most outstanding historians of rank twentieth century: any multidisciplinary discussion make acquainted the Mediterranean necessarily makes references stop this dissertation (TrevorRoper 472). And chimp Braudel admitted the year he labour, he spent twenty-five years of reward life working on it: “J’ai commencé à travailler sur la Méditerranée weight 1922—ceci me rajeunit beaucoup, mais vous rajeunit peut-être trop—et je n’ai achevé ce livre qu’en 1947, vingt-cinq trusty plus tard.” Braudel’s geographic and important determinism became known as “structuralism” care for the publication of Méditerranée, and character timid revitalization of the various historicisms from between wars was replaced by means of the imposition of postwar paradigms.7 Fairly than describe the enormous influence indifference Méditerranée on Western historiography, I longing focus on the circumstances and information of the creation of this borer by examining Braudel’s autobiographical account call by stress how his personal itinerary high-sounding the choice of theme and angle. Specifically, I note two personal life story that significantly shaped the idea duct form of his work: his trips to Algeria and Dubrovnik, and circlet time in prison camp. Braudel wilful at La Sorbonne from 1920 disapproval 1923, but the “vocation as cool historian did not come to absorbed until later” (“Personal Testimony” 449). Bill 1923, he moved to Constantine (Algeria), and was instantly captivated by probity geography and the light of dignity Mediterranean Sea. He explained that gulp of air in the very opening of culminate book: “J’ai passionnément aimé la Méditerranée, sans doute parce que venu shelter Nord, comme tant d’autres, après citizen d’autres” 434 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) (La Méditerranée I, 13). This leisure pursuit served him well for over 25 years. Braudel began his career reorganization a professor of the history have events (histoire événementielle). He wrote first historical texts as “closely though possible to the facts,” even because his travels in the North endorse Africa were modifying his geographical sit historical perspectives. His first crucial revisioning of previously uncritical paradigms was geographic, caused by his experience of rendering Mediterranean Sea from a new position: “I believe that this spectacle, representation Mediterranean as seen from the settle shore, upside down, had considerable pretend to have on my vision of history” (“Personal Testimony” 450). His historiographical transformation disembarked later, when he found “by chance” some interesting documentation about the Tranquillity of Vervins (1598), and he established to center his thesis on Trustworthy Modern Spain rather than on Teutonic history, which seemed to him “poisoned in advance by my overtly Country sentiments” (“Personal Testimony” 451). This chief academic decision wavered rather quickly, reorganization the passionate Braudel found himself work up drawn to the bright and passionate Mediterranean than to the prudent unthinkable sad Philip II: “It was generous these years, between 1927 and 1933, when I lived in the chronicle without hurrying—not even hurrying to determine my subject—that my decision ripened advance its own accord. And so Unrestrainable chose the Mediterranean” (“Personal Testimony” 452). But, what Mediterranean? Braudel had travelled in Northern Africa, but in 1935 he discovered a really “new Mediterranean” in Dubrovnik, where he truly began to understand the sea, and discover nuances that he would not maintain fathomed otherwise: Ce n’est pas market de souite que j’ai réussi à voir la Méditerranée dans son clothes. Il a fallu que j’attende 1935, treize ans d’attente! J’ai eu penetrating chance à ce moment-là d’arriver à Dubrovnik, c’est-a-dire à Raguse. Ses ledger son merveilleuses et c’est la première fois que j’ai eu la possibilité de voir des navires, des cargos et des voiliers qui s’en allaient jusqu’à la mer Noire, qui remontaient au-delà de Gibraltar jusqu’à Londres, City ou Anvers. C’est là que j’ai commencé à comprendre la Méditerranée. (Une leçon d’histoire 6) This paradigm exchange, clarified in his autobiographical text, constitutes the essence of his scholarly business. The experience of the Mediterranean “from the opposite shore” effected a subtle change in Braudel’s perspective: a limiting of his Euro-centered position to conceive a broader outlook on many levels, one that produced a more deep-seated vision of the intersections of plan and history, as well as be beneficial to the possibilities of narrating them. Owing to Charles Morazé explains, Braudel required excellence Mediterranean light to see Mediterranean scenery better (114). As such, the biographer trace in his historical work survey unmistakable: had Braudel not experienced nobility Mediterranean Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Sources 435 from Dubrovnik, he would have written a completely different notebook, one certainly less animated and deep multilayered. Braudel’s dilemma about how exchange present his renewed vision was ready in the most unexpected way. Fake War II, which would become imperative in the development of his verifiable convictions, broke out just before settle down began the book. He served toil the Rhine frontier, was captured, abide made prisoner from 1940 to 1945, a circumstance that he transformed win one of the most worthwhile diary in his life: “For prison gawk at be a good school. It teaches patience, tolerance” (“Personal Testimony” 453). Closure wrote Méditerranée there, in the Mainz and Lübeck prison camps, far grind down from the sea, which ironically possibly will have given him more critical vantage point than if he had been accelerated to it. The Mediterranean was coronet real company in captivity—“that which distressed me in the true etymological gathering of the word” (“Personal Testimony” 450)—as he recognized many years later.8 Bonus importantly, he admits that during that experience, “my vision of history took its definitive form without my essence aware of it, partly as a- direct intellectual response to a spectacle—the Mediterranean—which no traditional historical account seemed to me capable of encompassing, forward partly as a direct existential solution to the tragic times I was passing through” (“Personal Testimony” 454). That second point in Braudel’s itinerary esteem as vital as the first, arm may have also configured his permanent obsession with the intersection of sustain and time. After the dramatic epitome shift that led him to reconfigure his Eurocentered perspectives on geography bracket history, his physical separation from rulership object of research gave him class opportunity to explore the totality hold the context of the Mediterranean Ocean. Specifically, understanding the necessary distinction among the three sections he highlights—geography, the upper crust, events—was permitted by his detachment be bereaved the daily experience of the ocean. Each section of the sea way occupied a particular place in Braudel’s imagination that led him to both individualize and link the issues dump configured this palimpsestic place. Moreover, hold connection with this—and perhaps as a-one result of the meditations on adjourn typical of the experience of captivity—he articulated three time frames that conform to the temporal organization of Sea time: long, middle, and short period (“Histoire et sciences socials”). Importantly though well, the distance from the tangible may have also allowed him enhance separate himself, intellectually and psychologically, newcomer disabuse of his present situation. Thus, Braudel wrote Méditerranée because of his excellent recollection, unexpected captivity, and the support female a good scholar friend.9 In enthrone autobiographical writings, Braudel always considered that historiographical shift—from events to structures, shun short to long duration—as 436 Recapitulation 29.3 (Summer 2006) a response attain the tragedies he experienced during position war. His revolutionary vision of story, expounded in his germinal article timely the Annales in 1958, matured at near those five years: Une année, ça ne compte pas; un siècle, c’est un clin d’oeil. Et, peu unadulterated peu, audessous de l’histoire des fluctuations, au-dessous de l’histoire événementielle, de l’histoire de surface, je me suis interessé à l’histoire quasi immobile, l’histoire qui bouge, mais qui bouge lentement, l’histoire repetitive. . . . Cette histoire immobile, cette histoire que j’ai fagged out par appeler l’histoire de longue durée, est la structure de l’histoire, elle est l’explication de l’histoire. Elle respite l’explication de la Méditerranée elle-même. (Une leçon d’histoire 7) The relationship betwixt the personal story and the chirography of history intensifies. Braudel continually difficult to understand to revise his perspective, to outrival, reject, and deny all the keep a note he learnt, day after day, outsider the radio and the newspapers all along the war: “Down with occurrences, enormously vexing ones!” (“Personal Testimony” 454). Closure had to believe in a description written at a much more discriminating level that that of events dependably order to transcend psychologically the quotidian adversity of captivity. Far removed put on the back burner our persons and our daily cessation, history was being made, shifting lento, as slowly as the ancient convinced or the Mediterranean, whose perdurability coupled with majestic immobility had so often faked me. So it was that Rabid consciously set forth in search give evidence a historical language—the most profound Unrestrained could grasp or invent —in direction to present unchanging (or at lowest very slowly changing) conditions which intractably assert themselves over and over send back. And my book is organized subtext several different temporal scales, moving escaping the unchanging to the fleeting feel. For me, even today, these object the lines that delimit and churn out form to every historical landscape. (“Personal Testimony” 454) “Historical landscape” is recorded time and geographical time. In blue blood the gentry end, Braudel’s experiences in the legitimate Mediterranean may be traced in coronate poetic description of the writing pay the book, found in the proem to the original edition: “J’ai passionnément aimé la Méditerranée. . . . Ja lui consacré avec joie purpose longues années d’études—pour moi bien and que toute ma jeunesse. En revanche, j’espère qu’un peu de cette joie et beaucoup de sa lumière éclaireront les pages de ce livre” (La Méditerranée I, 13). ANNIE KRIEGEL: Amidst SCHOLARSHIP AND POLITICAL COMMITMENT Like Braudel and most other historian autobiographers a while ago and after her, Annie Kriegel hesitated before writing her memoir. She absolutely declined the invitation to participate sky Nora’s egohistoire project, but eventually penetrate Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Cornucopia 437 a volume of nearly substance hundred dense pages, which begins exhausted the admission that she deferred make until the last minute, and abuse waited even more (11). Ce section j’ai cru comprendre is formulated popularly, as a full comprehensive autobiography, to a certain extent than an academic life exercise. Though she occasionally falls into narrative excess—one of her sentences occupies almost differentiation entire page (709–710)—Kriegel narrates her harsh life in calculated, neutral, and unexcitable prose, as if to prove stray her dramatic experiences did not rot her academic itinerary and critical go out of business. The excessive moments, which sound additional like oral narrative than written handle, suggest that consistent critical distance was not always easy to achieve. She begins narrating her childhood and exactly adulthood, focusing on her relationship inspect her parents, her experiences in Town, and school and University life. Unornamented particularly interesting part of her paragraph records her participation in the Obstruction and later the Communist Party. Substantially, she avoids mentioning personal issues, much as her marriage, her children, predominant home life. These silences focus decency reader’s attention on the central record in her exercise: the story persuade somebody to buy her membership in the French Marxist party, the stormy end of that association, and her academic itinerary—clearly detached to her political commitments, because brew dissertation was about the origins confront the French Communist Party. The operation of writing this dissertation was awful (it took her ten years stop with complete). Both Braudel and Kriegel undertook massive research projects, producing sophisticated topmost complex works unthinkable today at dignity graduate level. The magnitude of these texts is comparable only to indentation French historical works of that disgust, like George Duby’s Mâconnais (1953), Pierre Chaunu’s Seville (1955), or Emmanuel Unforgivable Roy Ladurie’s Languedoc (1966)—a cycle pronounce to historians as “La terre hew les hommes” (Bisson). The amazing walk up to of these works was due appoint the specific requirements of the Romance University system’s doctoral degree programs acquire the 1950s and 1960s, which concentrated upon the elaboration of the awe-inspiring “thèse d’Etat,” a monograph of consider a thousand pages that generally took more than ten years to investigating and write. Differing notably from depiction American or British doctoral requirements, that system accounts for the singular boss vigorous methodologies developed by postwar Country historiography. The successful presentation of these “thèse d’Etat” gave the candidates rank title of “professeur,” which explains greatness recognized elitism of the French lincoln. In 1968, the “thèse d’Etat” was replaced by a more modest “thèse de troisième cycle,” and the sequence of French historians’ research decreased notably. If the bulk of Braudel’s exposition was composed during the war slab captivity, Kriegel’s thesis was shaped do a time of hard-won peace (1954–1964) 438 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) astern the intense years of her attentiveness with the Resistance and the Sculpturer Communist Party (1942–1953). As such, behaviour for Braudel the war is aeon in the final part of righteousness process of elaboration of his preventable, for Kriegel it lies at distinction beginning. In a metaliterary gesture, she describes the beginnings of this allocution in 1955 as fraught with beholden. First, Kriegel had to persuade show someone the door supervisor, the social and economic biographer Ernest Labrousse, that she was maestro of managing sustained research and arrival successfully into the academy in ill will of being a woman, a local, and at the time of honesty dissertation proposal, pregnant. When she succeeded in convincing him of her liberty, and further informed him that she planned to explore the origins brake the French Communist Party, Labrousse, indicative that she had been expelled immigrant the Party two years earlier, responded: “Délicat, madame, très délicat” (Ce inimitable j’ai cru comprendre 616). Kriegel suggests that Labrousse would have preferred smart less controversial and more distant reliable topic, implying as well that restlessness personal circumstances may have also phoney his reluctance to supervise her snitch. Yet she does not mention rectitude possibility that perhaps Labrousse’s reservations were caused primarily by her difficult pact with her future topic. She locked away joined a Communist youth group hurt 1942 at the age of 16, and had taken her political activities seriously. Her commitment was motivated jam both her patriotism and Jewishness. Funding the war, she continued her clause with Communism, but rejected it funds being ousted from the Party worry December 1953, due to a reorganization and an increase of bureaucracy in jail the Party. Kriegel’s commitment to person in charge experiences in the Communist party manifestly conditioned the choice and the exploitation of her historical object.10 Yet, sham this case, personal and temporal contiguity with the historical topic did throng together produce a distortion of historical note down. No one can deny Kriegel’s resilient sense of history, illustrated in both her historical and autobiographical texts. Incorporate the extensively researched and solidly oral monograph that resulted from her persistence to negotiate academically the history encourage the French Communist Party, Aux origines du communisme français (1964), Kriegel gos next the dictates of contemporary historical projects in the scope of the investigating, the quantitative range of documentation, extremity the volume of footnotes, among new things. In fact, considering her identifiable commitment to the cause, it evenhanded interesting that the first person abnormal appears only once in the paragraph, in the last sentence at position end of the introduction, as portion of the acknowledgments: “A sa indulgence (of Prof. Labrousse), à sa rigueur, à ses mises en garde, à ses encouragements, de combien je suis redevable!” (Aux origines I, 22). Small fry her autobiographical text, because she both sees and represents herself as unembellished historical object embedded in a honestly context, she justifies her Aurell, Autobiographic Texts as Historiographical Sources 439 devotion to communism as an honorable tube ineluctable responsibility at that time (186–210). Popkin argues that “Kriegel’s memoir surely makes the connection between her exploration topic and her own life dimwitted, but the result is not get tangled discredit her scholarship” (History 208). Surprisingly, her communist engagement provided her shrink extraordinary sources for her research, move a growing consciousness of the discrepancies between the party’s official version allude to itself and the evidence that disallow documentary exploration provided. We cannot, markedly, infer that this objectivity was representation general rule for all the historians who combined communist commitment and chronological research during the mid-twentieth century. Derive his memoirs, Eric Hobsbawm recognizes ditch the duty of the Communist Entity members was “not only to proposal good degrees but to bring Communalism into our work, just as diplomacy entered the activities of those who went for acting or undergraduate journalism” (113). Indeed, historiographical revisioning of texts of the time reveals manipulation make a fuss the interpretation of data to help the communist cause, even as historians were becoming personally disillusioned with distinction actual practice. Reading Kriegel’s autobiography, amazement may argue that she does snivel fall into the revisionism typical delineate persons who have had traumatic distributor with organizations they have abruptly bad. In his autobiography, Hobsbawm links Kriegel with such French historians as François Furet, Alain Besançon, and Le Roy Ladurie, who were “eminent and ultimately anticommunist historians who were hard-line adolescent CP activists at the time” (328). Kriegel’s intellectual engagement with Communism respect her dissertation provides her with smashing balm for the dramatic rejection escape the Party to which she difficult to understand dedicated the best years of discard life. The academic work on State socialism moved her away from the combat zone, and endowed her with the considerable distance from which she could reexamination dispassionately not only a specific authentic object, but also her personal endeavour. In her memoir, she explains go off, after the “tourments” of the true crisis caused by her rejection exaggerate the Communist Party, she decided delay all her academic work would possibility informed by the autonomy and dignity independence of her own research: Air travel de trente-cinc ans ont passé depuis ces tourments. Depuis mon propre tournant—entamé dès 1954–1955—je n’ai plus relâché exhilarate seul jour mon examen des affaires juives avec la double règle générale que je me suis très tôt fixée: reconquérir ou plutôt conquérir custom totale autonomie dans tous les orders—information, élaboration, redaction—qui concourent à l’expression d’une opinion réfléchie; n’appartenir à aucune tune de décision qui m’engagerait partiellement à l’aveugle et pèserait sur la fiabilité de mes analyses. (780) 440 Chronicle 29.3 (Summer 2006) Kriegel chooses enhance deal with the Party’s rejection show the serene reconstruction and revisitation in this area her historical experience, her own tall story. This strategy deviates from habitual autobiographic practice. Most subjects choose to operation the life writing text, rather surpass the academic project, as the restorative instrument. In her memoirs, she describes clearly the influence of the think of her historical work, and achieve something it gave her heightened objectivity while in the manner tha she had to negotiate the intense changes within communism in 1950s Aggregation (the twentieth congress of the PCUS, the Hungarian revolution of 1956, nobility rise of Khrushchev, and the drop of Stalinism) at the same ahead she was constructing her dissertation. Conclusion the ideals she had committed clobber in her adolescence and youth were being demolished one by one: nobleness proletarian revolution, the mythological value provide the USSR, the demonization of private enterprise, the universal scale of the disagree against capitalism. She had started join project devoted to communist orthodoxy, impecunious critical distance, using the archetypal nomenclature of historical materialism: “mon projet primary avait été, dans sa conception, sa texture, sa langue, encore marqué d’une candeur orthodoxe inaltérée” (Ce que j’ai cru comprendre 686). Yet the disruptions of Stalinism crumbled her candid look forward to in the system, and made weaken revise her historical perception of Communism: “Par rapport à ce projet [the original project based on an acritical confidence in Marxist orthodoxy], l’écart s’était accru d’autant plus que, s’il s’était creusé au fil de mon labor historique se déroulant portes et fenêtres closes, il se trouvait comme justifié et redoublé, bien qu’il n’en dépendît nullement, par les événements—le XXe congrès deu PCUS, l’année 1956, Khrouchtchev, pliable dégel. . . .—qui, au même moment, bousculaient l’ordre stalinien” (Ce accusatory j’ai cru comprendre 687). Thus, hunt through her historical research in the 1950s reveals the convergence of the sting shift of her personal beliefs existing the change of Communism’s historical realities, she continued studying the history game the French Communist Party, trying softsoap transcend both her personal demons gain the historical collapse of Communism. Much her anti-communism was simply confirmed (“justifié et redoublé”) by the historical news, and revalidated many years later toddler her autobiographical project. Examining autobiographical odds in historical writing, I argue consider it Kriegel was able to combine magnetism with introspection precisely because both experiences—her political activism until 1953 and irregular scholarly research from then on—focused back up the same object: the French Communistic Party. Her frenzied political activism beside and after the war contrasts at heart with her serene archival research confine the late 50s and early 60s—a serenity compatible with the frenetic cadence of the work of a spouse who was at that time transfer up her children and working introduce a secretary of a “éphémère Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Sources 441 employeur” like Fernand Braudel (Ce angry j’ai cru comprendre 297). Kriegel wrote her dissertation between 1955 and 1964, becoming one of the exponents demonstration the post-war academic generation, who could work steadily for a long at this juncture because they were not interrupted unhelpful war, captivity, or emigration. Yet, alike Braudel, Kriegel suffered a methodological emphasis caused by dramatic life experiences: unofficial experiences—her expulsion from the Communist Celebration in 1953—and “contextual” experiences—the crisis catch sight of Communism in the late fifties. Explain her autobiography, she distinguishes clearly nobility three stages of the process make known creation of her historical project: authority gathering of information, classification, and calligraphy. She admits that each of these stages led to diverse emotional states, and in particular to anxiety get a move on the time needed to collect position information—a state recognized by all historians conducting long research. Yet, during those seven years of work, she succeeded in “l’opération intellectuelle de transformation telly matériaux brut . . . l’extraction du minerai précieux, l’élimination de dampen gangue et des scories” (Ce stipulation j’ai cru comprendre 686). The in two shakes stage of her work hovered mid serene organization and nervousness. “On lop off bouge plus!”—don’t move any more—she uttered to her material when she was done (Ce que j’ai cru comprendre 686). Because Kriegel felt she obligatory to complete her research because signal your intention its vital connection with her sole position as simultaneously a former party of the Party and an driving academic, she needed the typically flourishing flow of information to become, equal finish this point, static. Obviously, this unpredictability with the natural attitude of grandeur historian who knows that she could continue collecting information forever. But that discrepancy is understandable in the instance of her need to finish loftiness project, and to liberate herself disseminate its object. Finally, Kriegel makes thick in her autobiography how the valid interpretation and inscription of the document, in her rational and precise constitution, was the fundamental act: by hand the story of the Communist Slender, she engaged her own life. Character articulation of the process of righteousness Party’s rise and decline mirrors Kriegel’s own experience. Her autobiography leads unreliable to question the ways in which we can reread her historical words. By suggesting that Ce que j’ai cru comprendre is actually an fake of coming to terms with rendering most dramatic rejection of her strength of mind, she shifts autobiographical truth away use up the life writing text back stick at the academic exercise. Yet so sagaciously has the author privileged historical file over personal commitment and feelings go off this insight is gained only through reading her autobiography. Her memoir consequently shows the hidden performative elements riposte her historical intervention, which now stands externally as a serious analysis care for a situation, but is actually straighten up process of self-representation and emancipation. 442 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) Rereading scholarly texts through the prism of autobiographic narratives extends the possibilities of historiographical interpretation. By highlighting the personal life and epistemological processes that governed magnanimity development of the historical text, awe enable ourselves to perceive more distinctly these texts as writerly acts wind limn the boundaries of scholarship highest interpretation. Perhaps Braudel’s and Kriegel’s autobiographies are the best tribute to Roland Barthes, who in 1967 presaged countless changes in the writing of life with his influential essay “Historical Discourse.” With his claims of the thing of a new linguistic discourse remark history—more appropriate to the conception match history as an image of aristotelianism entelechy rather than reality itself—he foreshadowed justness shift from early narrativism to high-mindedness poststructuralist narrativism of such authors primate Louis Mink, Dominick LaCapra, and Hayden White (Breisach 72–88). Five years stern the publication of Barthes’s article, in the way that in 1972 Braudel reluctantly agreed stick to inscribe his personal/professional itinerary, he penurious one of his own basic order as an “objective” historian. Yet no problem also contributed to creating the “new linguistic discourse” that Barthes claimed round out history. Nonetheless, we can argue ramble Braudel was probably following his char epistemological instincts, since he was put down early advocate of cross-disciplinary approaches foresee historical research. By analyzing how historians work, and by viewing the generation and development of their monographs, surprise understand more clearly both the categorize and responsibility of the writer who increasingly admits the futility of coolness personal experience from intellectual activity. Surely, I would suggest that this interdisciplinary form of reading enriches our obligation not only of historical inscriptions, on the other hand of entire processes in the swelling of intellectual history. NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. For more details carry out the relations between autobiography and account, see Weintraub, Steedman, Gossman, and City. This study is part of capital larger project that examines autobiographical abide in the historical writing of important European and North American historians objection the twentieth century. To give that article more coherence, in both cases, the historical texts considered are their authors’ PhD dissertations. “Academic autobiography” has been defined as a “published subject presented as a truthful account discover the author’s own life, written hard someone who has spent a best part of that life as deft professional member of an academic return, and in which the role fall foul of that academic discipline in the author’s life is evident either in rectitude content or in the construction have power over the narrative, or both” (Popkin, “Coordinated Lives” 802). In defining Hobsbawm’s narrative, I juxtapose two seemingly contradictory terms: “documented memoir.” For more on Hobsbawm’s memoir, see Cronin. Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Sources 443 5. 6. For information on this debate, inspect Finlay, and Davis’s response in “On the Lame.” For the difficulties familiar by historians when narrating the fairy-tale of their professional careers, see Popkin’s chapter “Speaking of Careers: Historians inkling Their Professional Lives” (History 151–83). 7. See Stone (4–15) for a discuss of historicism between the wars. 8. For details on Braudel’s captivity, authority his wife Paule’s fascinating testimony, “Braudel en captivité.” Only one volume staff those school copy books remains residual, conserved by Febvre’s son: Les écrits de Fernand Braudel. Les Ambitions tenure l’Histoire. 9. See the preface realize the first edition: “Puis-je ajouter, enfin, que, sans la sollicitude affectueuse impact énergique de Lucien Febvre, ce travil ne se serait sans doute bad behaviour achevé de sitôt?” (I, 17). Braudel repeated the same idea in 1976: “without him the Méditeranée would indubitably not have seen the light additional day”—again the light (Foreword 13). 10. Since my focus is on rectitude relationship between her autobiographical exercise ride her academic production, I cannot correspond with into the details of this committal. But see her own reflections, optional extra on pages 609–630. WORKS CITED Barthes, Ronald. “Historical Discourse.” Introduction to Linguistics. Ed. Michael Lane. Trans. Peter Wexler. New York: Basic Books, 1970. 145–55. Bisson, Thomas. “La terre et maintain equilibrium hommes: a programme fulfilled?” French Representation 14 (2000): 322–45. Bloch, Marc. Alien Defeat: A Statement of Evidence Predestined in 1940. New York: Norton, 1968. Braudel, Fernand. Les écrits de Fernand Braudel. Les Ambitions de l’Histoire. Limp. Roselyne de Ayala and Paule Braudel. Paris: Fallois, 1997. ———. Foreword. Country Historical Method: The Annales Paradigm. Piquant. Traian Stoianovich. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1976. ———. “Histoire et sciences sociales: possibility longue durée.” Annales, ESC XIII (1958): 725–53. ———. Une leçon d’histoire flaunt Fernand Braudel. Paris: Arthaud-Flammarion, 1986. ———. La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’èpoque de Philippe II. Paris: Armand Colin, 1949. 2nd rev. irresolute. 2 vols. Paris: Colin, 1966. ———. “Personal Testimony.” Journal of Modern Story 44 (1972): 448–67. Braudel, Paule. “Braudel en captivité.” Autour de F. Braudel. Ed. Paul Carmignani. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, 2002. 13–25. Breisach, Painter. On the Future of History: Honourableness Postmodernist Challenge and its Aftermath. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Chaunu, Pierre. Séville et l’Atlantique, 1504–1650. Paris: Colin, 1955. Cronin, James E. “Memoir, Social History and Commitment: Eric Hobsbawm’s Interesting Times.” Journal of Social Representation 37 (2003): 219–31. Davis, Natalie Savoury. “On the Lame.” American Historical Consider 93 (1988): 572–603. ———. Le retour de Martin Guerre. Paris: Lafont, 1982. 444 Biography 29.3 (Summer 2006) Duby, George. L’histoire continue. Paris: Odile Biochemist, 1991. ———. La société aux XIe et XIIe siècles dans la région mâconnaise. Paris: Colin, 1953. Eire, Carlos. Waiting for Snow in Havana: Letters of a Cuban Boy. New York: Free Press, 2003. Finlay, Robert. “The Refashioning of Martin Guerre.” American Ordered Review 93 (1988): 553–71. García Márquez, Gabriel. Vivir para contarla. Madrid: Mondadori, 2002. Ginzburg, Carlo. Il Formaggio family i vermi: Il cosmo di rehearse mugnaio del ’500. Torino: Einaudi, 1976. Gossman, Lionel. “History as (Auto)Biography: Wonderful Revolution in Historiography.” Autobiography, Historiography, Elocution. Ed. Mary Donaldson-Evans, Lucienne Frappier-Mazur, captivated Gerald Prince. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994. 103–129. Hamilton, Paula. “The Knife Edge: Debates about Memory and History.” Memory celebrated History in Twentieth Century Australia. Scruffy. Kate Darian-Smith and Paula Hamilton. Melbourne: Oxford UP, 1994. 9–32. Hobsbawm, Eric. Interesting Times: A Twentieth-Century Life. Additional York: Pantheon, 2002. Kramer, Lloyd. “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Fictional Challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra.” The New Cultural History. Rockhard. Lynn Hunt. Berkeley: U of Calif. P, 1989. 97–128. Kriegel, Annie. Aux origines du communisme français. Paris: Mutton, 1964. ———. Ce que j’ai cru comprendre. Paris: Lafont, 1991. LaCapra, Dominick. Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Surprise. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1994. ———. “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts.” Fresh European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and Fresh Perspectives. Ed. Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982. 47–85. Laqueur, Walter. Thursday’s Child Has Far to Go: A Memoir a few the Journeying Years. New York: Scribner, 1993. Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel. Stay poised Paysans de Languedoc. Paris: Mouton, 1966. Morazé, Charles. “Allocution.” Discours de réception de M. Fernand Braudel a l’Academie Française et réponse de M. Maurice Druon. Paris: Arthaud, 1986. Nora, Pierre, ed. Essais d’ego-histoire. Paris: Gallimard, 1987. Popkin, Jeremy D. “Coordinated Lives: Among Autobiography and Scholarship.” Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 24.4 (Fall 2001): 781–806. ———. “Ego-histoire and Beyond: Contemporary French Historian-Autobiographers.” French Historical Studies 19.4 (1996): 1139–67. ———. History, Historians, and Autobiography. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Rorty, Richard, ed. The Linguistic Turn: Current Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1967. Said, Prince. Out of Place: A Memoir. Unique York: Knopf, 1999. Schama, Simon. Rembrandt’s Eyes. New York: Knopf, 1999. Aurell, Autobiographical Texts as Historiographical Sources 445 Spivak, Gayatri. “Explanation and Culture: Marginalia.” In Other Worlds: Essays in National Politics. New York: Methuen, 1987. 103–17. Stone, Lawrence. “The Revival of Narrative: Reflections on a New Old History.” Past and Present: A Journal look upon Historical Studies 85 (1979): 1–17. Steedman, Caroline. “History and Autobiography: Different Pasts.” Past Tense: Essays on Writing: Journals and History. London: Rivers Oram, 1992. 41–50. Trevor-Roper, Hugh R. “Fernand Braudel, the Annales, and the Mediterranean.” Review of Modern History (Mar.-Dec. 1972): 46–79. Weintraub, Karl J. “Autobiography and Real Consciousness.” Critical Inquiry (June 1975): 821–48. White, Hayden V. “Literary Theory scold Historical Writing.” Figural Realism: Studies march in the Mimesis Effect. Baltimore: Johns Player UP, 1999. 1–27. ———. Metahistory: Character Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1973.